Refeeding syndrome – awareness, prevention and management
© Mehanna et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 08 December 2008
Accepted: 26 January 2009
Published: 26 January 2009
Refeeding syndrome is an important, yet commonly overlooked condition affecting patients. It occurs when feeding is commenced after a period of starvation. Head and neck cancer patients are at particular risk owing to prolonged periods of poor nutritional intake. This may be from general effects such as cancer anorexia or from more specific problems of dysphagia associated with this group of patients. Awareness of the condition is crucial in identifying patients at risk and taking measures to prevent its occurrence.
The aims of this review are to:
1) Highlight the condition and stress the importance of its consideration when admitting head and neck cancer patients.
2) Discuss the pathophysiology behind refeeding syndrome.
3) Review the literature for the best available evidence and guidelines.
4) Highlight the need for further high quality research.
Refeeding syndrome is potentially fatal, yet is preventable. Awareness and identification of at-risk patients is crucial to improving management.
Refeeding syndrome is caused by rapid refeeding after a period of under-nutrition, characterised by hypophosphataemia, electrolyte shifts and has metabolic and clinical complications.
High risk patients include the chronically under-nourished and those with little intake for greater than 10 days. Patients with dysphagia are at particular risk.
Refeeding should commence at 10 kcal/kg per day in patients at risk, and increased slowly. Thiamine, vitamin B complex and multi-vitamin supplements should be started with refeeding.
New NICE guidelines state that pre-feeding correction of electrolyte and fluid deficits is unnecessary, but should be done concurrently with re-feeding.
More research in this field is needed as the evidence base is lacking.
Refeeding syndrome was first described after the Second World War in prisoners who exhibited cardiac and neurological abnormalities with commencement of feeding after long periods of starvation . Refeeding syndrome is defined as severe, (and potentially fatal) electrolyte and fluid shifts associated with metabolic abnormalities in malnourished patients undergoing refeeding, whether orally, enterally, or parenterally . The hallmark feature is hypophosphataemia, however other biochemical abnormalities are common including disorder of sodium and fluid balance, changes in glucose, protein and fat metabolism, thiamine deficiency, hypokalaemia and hypomagnesaemia [2, 3]. It is often not recognised, especially in non-specialist wards.
The incidence of refeeding syndrome is unknown, largely because no universally accepted definition exists. Using a proxy marker to show patients at risk of refeeding syndrome, namely those with severe hypophosphataemia, one study demonstrated a rate of 0.43% in hospital patients, with malnutrition being one of the strongest risk factors . In a well-designed prospective cohort study of a heterogeneous group of intensive care unit ICU patients, 34% of patients experienced hypophosphataemia soon after feeding was started (mean1.9 SD 1.1 days) . Other prospective and retrospective cohort studies of hyperalimentation in ICU have also demonstrated the incidence of refeeding syndrome [2, 6].
In early starvation, blood glucose levels decline, resulting in a decrease in insulin and an increase in glucagon levels. This stimulates glycogenolysis in the liver and lipolysis of triacetylglycerol in fat reserves producing fatty acids (FAs) and glycerol which are used by tissues for energy and converted to ketone bodies in the liver. As glycogen reserves then become depleted, gluconeogenesis is stimulated in the liver, utilising amino acids (derived from the breakdown of muscle), lactate and glycerol resulting in the synthesis of glucose for use by the brain and red blood cells. The main result of these changes is that the body switches the main energy course from carbohydrate to protein and fat. The basal metabolic rate decreases by as much as 20–25% .
As fasting continues, the body aims to conserve muscle and protein. The tissues decrease their use of ketone bodies, and use fatty acids as their main energy source. This results in an increase in blood levels of ketone bodies, stimulating the brain to switch from glucose to ketone bodies as its main energy source. The liver decreases its rate of gluconeogenesis due to the reduced need for glucose by the brain thus preserving muscle protein which is its source of amino acids. As a consequence, several intracellular minerals become severely depleted. The concentrations of these minerals (including phosphate) may remain normal in the serum however.
The underlying causative factor of refeeding syndrome is the metabolic and hormonal changes caused by rapid refeeding, whether enteral or parenteral. On refeeding, the absorbed glucose leads to increased blood glucose levels, which increase insulin and decrease glucagon secretion. The net result of these changes is the synthesis of glycogen, fat and protein. This anabolic state requires minerals such as phosphate and magnesium and cofactors such as thiamine. Insulin stimulates the absorption of potassium into the cells (via the Na-K ATPase symporter), with both magnesium and phosphate also taken up. Water is drawn in to the intracellular compartment by osmosis. This decreases serum levels of phosphate, potassium and magnesium further, and results in the clinical features of refeeding syndrome.
Key elements and minerals
Phosphorus is a predominantly intracellular mineral. It is essential for almost all intracellular processes and structural integrity of the cell membrane. It is necessary for energy storage – adenosine triphosphate (ATP), for enzyme/and second messenger activation by phosphate binding, for control of the affinity of the oxygen binding to haemoglobin (via 2,3-diphosphoglycerate[[2, 3] DPG], ATP). It is particularly important in the regulation of pH by acid-base buffering.
In refeeding syndrome, long-term depletion of phosphorus in the body occurs along with a greatly increased use of phosphate in the cells caused by the insulin surge. This leads to a deficit in intracellular and extracellular phosphorus. In this environment, even small drops in serum phosphorus may lead to widespread dysfunction of the cellular processes described above .
Potassium is the main intracellular cation. It too is depleted in under-nutrition, whilst its serum concentration usually remains within the normal range. On refeeding, insulin causes potassium to be taken into the cells. This causes significant hypokalaemia and as a result, derangements in the electrochemical membrane potential, potentially leading to abnormalities in cardiac rhythm and even cardiac arrest.
Magnesium is an important intracellular ion. It is an essential cofactor in most enzyme systems including oxidative phosphorylation and ATP production. It is also necessary for the structural integrity of DNA, RNA and ribosomes. In addition it affects membrane potential, and deficiency can lead to cardiac dysfunction and neuromuscular complications . Magnesium and potassium levels are linked , and so severe hypomagnesaemia will lead to hypokalaemia. Therefore only replacing potassium will not lead to a correction of the potassium deficit, as magnesium replacement has to occur concurrently.
After starvation, glucose intake suppresses gluconeogenesis by leading to the release of insulin and the suppression of glycogen. If taken in large quantities, glucose intake may therefore lead to hyperglycaemia, with osmotic diuresis, dehydration, metabolic acidosis and ketoacidosis. Excess glucose also leads to lipogenesis (again caused by insulin stimulation). This may cause fatty liver, increased CO2 production, hypercapnoea and respiratory failure .
Starvation will usually result in several vitamin deficiencies. The most important of these with respect to refeeding is thiamine, as it is an essential coenzyme in carbohydrate metabolism. Deficiency in thiamine can lead to Korsakoff's syndrome (retrograde and anterograde amnesia, confabulation) and Wernicke's encephalopathy (ocular abnormalities, ataxia, confusional state, hypothermia, coma) .
Sodium, nitrogen and fluid
Intake of carbohydrate leads to rapid decrease in renal excretion of sodium and water . If fluids are then given to maintain a normal urine output, patients may rapidly become fluid overloaded. This is made worse by the loss of cardiac muscle during starvation. This can lead to cardiac myopathy and reduced contractility further – resulting in cardiac failure.
Early identification of at-risk patients
• Oncology patients
• Chronic Alcoholism
• Postoperative patients
• Anorexia Nervosa
• Elderly patients (comorbidities, decreased physiological reserve)
• Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus (electrolyte depletion, diuresis)
• Chronic Malnutrition
- Prolonged fasting/hypocaloric feeding
- Morbid obesity with profound weight loss
- High stress patient unfed for >7 days
- Malabsorptive syndrome e.g. inflammatory bowel disease, chronic pancreatitis, cystic fibrosis, short bowel syndrome
• Chronic antacid users (Mg/Al salts bind phosphate)
• Chronic diuretic users (loss of electrolytes)
NICE Criteria for determining people at high risk of developing refeeding problems 
Patient has one or more of the following:
- BMI less than 16 kg/m2
- unintentional weight loss greater than 15% within the last 3–6 months
- little or no nutritional intake for more than 10 days
- low levels of potassium, phosphate or magnesium prior to feeding.
Or patient has two or more of the following:
- BMI less than 18.5 kg/m2
- unintentional weight loss greater than 10% within the last 3–6 months
- little or no nutritional intake for more than 5 days
- a history of alcohol abuse or drugs including insulin, chemotherapy, antacids or diuretics.
Treatment of refeeding syndrome
The re-introduction of feeding needs to be approached with caution. Previous guidelines have stressed the importance of adequate replacement of electrolytes, vitamins and minerals before the commencement of feeding, be that enterally or parenterally . This potentially risks prolonging the period of malnutrition the patient has to endure. The newer guidelines from NICE  now suggest that as long as replacement occurs in parallel with feeding, this is sufficient.
Vitamin replacement should be started straight away, in particular thiamine and vitamin B to reduce the incidence of Wernicke's encephalopathy or Korsakoff's syndrome, with 200–300 mg oral thiamine daily, and 1–2 tablets vitamin B high potency 3 times daily, and multivitamin or trace element supplement once daily. This replacement once started should be continued for at least 10 days.
If levels of key electrolytes are found to be low, they can be replaced via oral, enteral or intravenous routes depending on how low the levels are and what methods of refeeding are possible. There is little good quality evidence on the best replacement regimes, (one of the key areas where future research needs to be focused) but NICE have made recommendations, including potassium (2–4 mmol/kg/day), phosphate (0.3–0.6 mmol/kg/day), and magnesium (0.2 mmol/kg/day intravenously or 0.4 mmol/kg/day orally).
The rate of refeeding from these same guidelines  depends on the severity of the malnutrition prior to refeeding. In moderate risk patients, in any patient who has eaten little or nothing for more than 5 days, the recommendation is a rate of no more than 50% of the energy requirements. If after careful monitoring of clinical and biochemical status, all remains well this rate can start to be increased. If the patient falls in to one of the high risk categories, (see above and tables 1 and 2) replacement of energy should be started slowly with a maximum rate of10 kcal/kg every 24 hours. It can then be increased to meet or exceed full needs over the next 4 to 7 days, and as before, particular attention needs to be paid to biochemical indices and fluid balance. In patients who are very malnourished (body mass index ≤ 14 or a negligible intake for two weeks or more), the NICE guidelines recommend that refeeding should start at a maximum of 5 kcal/kg/24 hours, with cardiac monitoring owing to the risk of cardiac arrhythmias. Circulatory volume should also be replaced but care should be taken not to overload patients.
Refeeding syndrome is an important condition and one that is often diagnosed late in patients at risk. It is particularly relevant to the patients under the care of head and neck surgeons. The key to better patient care in this area is prevention by increased clinician awareness and involvement of specialist dietetic support early on. If patients are diagnosed or suspected then there are now guidelines in place to help with management, however, it must be stressed that many of the recommendations are not based on high quality evidence and this must be highlighted as an area that needs future research time dedicated to it.
About the authors
Hisham Mehanna BMedSc (Hons) MB ChB (Hons) FRCS (ORL_HNS)
Consultant and Honorary Associate Professor
Paul C Nankivell BA BM BCh MRCS
Jamil Moledina BSc (Hons) MBBS MRCS
Senior House Officer
Macmillan Specialist Dietitian
Tables and figure reproduced from 'Refeeding syndrome: what it is, and how to prevent and treat it Mehanna H, Moledina J, Travis J BMJ 2008;336:1495–1498' with permission from BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
- Schnitker MA, Mattman PE, Bliss TL: A clinical study of malnutrition in Japanese prisoners of war. Ann Intern Med. 1951, 35: 69-96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crook MA, Hally V, Panteli JV: The importance of the refeeding syndrome. Nutrition. 2001, 17: 632-7. 10.1016/S0899-9007(01)00542-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hearing S: Refeeding syndrome. BMJ. 2004, 328 (7445): 908-909. 10.1136/bmj.328.7445.908.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Camp MA, Allon M: Severe hypophosphatemia in hospitalised patients. Mineral & Electrolyte Metabolism. 16 (6): 365-368.Google Scholar
- Marik PE, Bedigan MK: Refeeding Hypophosphataemia in an Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Study. Arch Surg. 131: 1043-1047.Google Scholar
- Hayek ME, Eisenberg PG: Severe hypophosphatemia following the institution of enteral feedings. Arch Surg. 124: 1325-1328.Google Scholar
- McCray S, Walker S, Parrish CR: Much ado about refeeding. Practical Gastroenterology. XXVIII (12): 26-44.Google Scholar
- Knochel JP: The clinical status of hypophosphatemia: an update. NEJM. 313: 447-449.Google Scholar
- Wacker WEC, Parisi AF: Magnesium Metabolism. NEJM. 278: 658-663.Google Scholar
- Solomon R: The relationship between disorders of K+ and Mg+ homeostasis. Semin Nephrol. 7 (3): 253-62.Google Scholar
- Klein CJ, Stanek GS, Wiles CE: Overfeeding macronutrients to critically ill adults. J AmDiet Assoc. 98: 795-806. 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00179-5.Google Scholar
- Reuler JB, Girard DE, Cooney TG: Wernicke's encephalopathy. NEJM. 312: 1035-1039.Google Scholar
- Veverbrants E, Arky RA: Effects of fasting and refeeding: I. Studies on sodium, potassium and water excretion on a constant electrolyte and fluid intake. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 29: 55-62.Google Scholar
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Nutrition support in adults. Clinical guideline CG32. 2006Google Scholar
- Dewar H, Horvath R: Refeeding syndrome. A pocket guide to clinical nutrition. Edited by: Todorovic VE, Micklewright A. 2001, British Dietetic Association, 2Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.