Skip to main content
Download PDF

Raman spectroscopy in head and neck cancer

Head & Neck Oncology volume 2, Article number: 26 (2010) Cite this article

Abstract

In recent years there has been much interest in the use of optical diagnostics in cancer detection. Early diagnosis of cancer affords early intervention and greatest chance of cure. Raman spectroscopy is based on the interaction of photons with the target material producing a highly detailed biochemical 'fingerprint' of the sample. It can be appreciated that such a sensitive biochemical detection system could confer diagnostic benefit in a clinical setting. Raman has been used successfully in key health areas such as cardiovascular diseases, and dental care but there is a paucity of literature on Raman spectroscopy in Head and Neck cancer. Following the introduction of health care targets for cancer, and with an ever-aging population the need for rapid cancer detection has never been greater. Raman spectroscopy could confer great patient benefit with early, rapid and accurate diagnosis. This technique is almost labour free without the need for sample preparation. It could reduce the need for whole pathological specimen examination, in theatre it could help to determine margin status, and finally peripheral blood diagnosis may be an achievable target.

Introduction

In recent years there has been much interest in the use of optical diagnostics in cancer detection. At present a diagnosis of cancer is made on histological evaluation with possible prior cytological evidence. In some cases definitive diagnosis is only made on resection of the tumor, as prior interventions have been equivocal. Early diagnosis of cancer affords early intervention and greatest chance of cure. The ability to detect early biochemical changes associated with carcinogenesis prior to the changes a pathologist identifies would revolutionize cancer diagnostics.

Infrared spectroscopy, along with other optical techniques such as elastic scattering spectroscopy, differential path-length spectroscopy, fluorescence techniques, and optical coherence tomography have been assessed in the detection of head and neck tumors [1, 2]. These have all provided encouraging results; Raman spectroscopy is in the early stages of development in relation to life sciences and this article aims to review the literature regarding its application to head and neck cancer.

Background

The Raman Effect was first discovered by Professor Raman of Calcutta University for which he was awarded the Nobel prize in 1930 [3]. This effect is based on light's interaction with matter; as photons are directed towards target matter, most will pass through unchanged. However, some photons will come into contact with molecules in the matter. Most of these photons will interact with the molecules of the substance, exciting the particles to a partial quantum state, with the emission of a photon at the same frequency as the incident photon [4]. This process is known as elastic scattering. A smaller number of these (approximately 1 in 106 to 1 in 108) photons will undergo a process called Raman or inelastic scattering. The photon is discharged from the material or 'scattered' at a differing wavelength than the incident photon and it is this wavelength shift which is recorded in Raman spectroscopy.

Raman spectroscopy is highly specific and affords the ability to take recordings from very small sections of the target sample (figure 1). The interaction of the photons with the target material produces a detailed biochemical 'fingerprint' of the sample that is characteristic for the constituent chemical bonds (figure 2). It can be appreciated that such a sensitive, high resolution biochemical detection system could confer diagnostic benefit in a clinical setting. The upper aerodigestive tract is generally more easily accessible than other regions of the body, allowing detection systems to be used in office or community settings. A Raman based diagnostic system could not only afford early tissue analysis of a solid tumour but also the possibility of detecting biochemical changes within peripheral blood of patients with cancer.

Figure 1
figure1

A thyroid cell under the microscope attached to the Raman system. This picture highlights the resolution of the Raman system, as measurements can be taken (at the cross-hairs) from a small section of a single cell (1 micro-metre squared area).

Full size image
Figure 2
figure2

Raman spectra taken from a single thyroid cell, depicting multiple 'spikes' attributable to biochemical species within the cell. Some of the chemical bonds have been labeled for identification.

Full size image

Literature

Harris et al. (2009) studied the ability of Raman spectroscopy to discriminate between two thyroid cell lines [5]. These were commercial cell lines; one of a non-cancer lineage and the other an anaplastic carcinoma cell line (figures 3 and 4). Raman spectroscopy coupled with neural network analysis gave 95% sensitivity for the anaplastic cell line and 92% for the non-cancerous cell line. Following on from these encouraging results the authors' further tested the system using five thyroid cell lines including; non-cancerous, papillary carcinoma, follicular carcinoma, medullary carcinoma and anaplastic carcinoma [6]. This time Raman spectroscopy was coupled with genetic algorithms for data analysis. Results demonstrated a relatively poor discrimination (sensitivity 61%) between cell lines of a similar genotype and ultimately phenotype, such as non-cancerous versus papillary carcinoma but when cells from opposing ends of the biological spectrum were tested such as non-cancerous versus medullary or anaplastic carcinoma, the results were much better (88% and 91% respectively). The authors are taking forward this work with testing of the algorithm using actual tissue samples.

Figure 3
figure3

Human follicular thyroid cells viewed under confocal microscopy The cells had been stained with Alexa fluor 488 Phalloidin for actin, and To-pro3 for the nuclei.

Full size image
Figure 4
figure4

Human anaplastic thyroid cells viewed under confocal microscopy. The cells had been stained with Alexa fluor 488 Phalloidin for actin, and To-pro3 for the nuclei.

Full size image

In 2000, Stone and colleagues examined the use of Raman spectroscopy in the detection of laryngeal malignancy [7]. Fifteen ex-vivo biopsy specimens were obtained from patients of varying ages (18 to 79 years). They analyzed three classes of specimen (normal, dysplastic and squamous cell carcinoma). Their results demonstrated sensitivities of between 76 and 92% depending on the tissue type examined and specificities of over 90%. On further examination, the regions in the Raman spectra associated with differences between the tissue types corresponded with protein bonds and nucleic acids, leading to the discovery that nucleic acids levels are increased with malignancy. Lau et al., (2005) undertook a similar study in which 47 laryngeal specimens were interrogated with Raman spectroscopy [8]. They obtained each spectrum with a five second acquisition time. The classes of specimen used were normal, papilloma and carcinoma. Sensitivities were similar to the study by Stone et al. (69 to 89%), with specificities ranging from 86 to 94%. The authors determined that spectral differences occurred in the DNA, amino acids, collagen and glycolipids, accounting for the ability to discriminate between the tissue types. Further experimental work on laryngeal tissue was carried out by Teh and colleagues (2008). They demonstrated that provided high quality Raman spectra could be obtained with a collection time of five seconds, discrimination between cancer and non-cancer samples provided a diagnostic sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 91%.

Lau et al. (2003) used Raman spectroscopy to classify tissue obtained from the post-nasal space in cancer and non-cancer patients [9]. The importance of utilizing Raman spectroscopy in the nasopharynx is the ability to detect sub-mucosal tumors associated with this cancer in this region, preventing the need for random biopsy. The study was small, observing spectra from six cancer and six non-cancer patients however, spectral differences were noted in the regions of the spectra associated with collagen, proteins and lipids.

Gniadecka and co-workers (2004) applied Raman spectroscopy coupled with neural network analysis to identify skin lesions [10]. Raman spectra were obtained from 22 melanoma samples, 41 pigmented nevi, 48 basal cell carcinoma samples, 23 seborrheic keratoses samples, and 89 normal skin samples. It was found that malignant melanoma could be discriminated from the other tissue samples based on the amide I protein region (1660 cm-1) of the spectra; sensitivity and specificity for melanoma was 85% and 89% respectively.

The main author of this article along with colleagues assessed the feasibility for Raman spectroscopy coupled with genetic algorithms to diagnose cancer through a peripheral blood sample [11]. This has the potential to revolutionize medical diagnostics with the ability for the community practitioner to have a diagnosis prior to specialist referral allowing treatment options to be booked at the earliest opportunity.

Forty patients in total were tested, twenty with an established diagnosis of head and neck carcinoma (although not all squamous cell carcinoma), and twenty aged-matched controls with respiratory ailments comprised the control group. Using a trained genetic algorithm the authors found a 75% sensitivity and 75% specificity for each cohort. When mixed samples were used to train the algorithm, the results gave the expected 50% sensitivity and specificity, providing further evidence that the algorithm was able to discriminate between cancer and non-cancer samples. The results of 75% are promising when considering what is being attempted although further testing of the algorithm with a greater number of samples and the use of different varieties of samples is also warranted.

The oral cavity is readily accessible in a clinic setting and would be ideal for the development of a Raman probe for cancer detection. Premalignant changes such as leukoplakia, erythroplakia, and erythro-leukoplakia are observed and in many cases multiple biopsies are undertaken with periods of watchful waiting. Malini and colleagues (2006) studied the ability of Raman spectroscopy to discriminate 216 pre-malignant, malignant, inflammatory and normal tissue samples from the oral cavity [12]. The discrimination between tissue types was based on surface findings. Normal healthy cell spectra originate from the lipid bi-layer, whereas inflammatory or cancerous cells contain multiple proteins on the cell surface. Disease sates were also readily distinguishable when multi-parameter tests were added in conjunction with principal component analysis.

The Raman analysis of saliva has the potential to detect malignancy within the oral cavity or orophaynx. Oral squamous cell carcinoma has a particular poor 5-year survival rate, approaching 5% [13]. This is mainly thought to be due to the late presentation of these tumours. Saliva contains many macromolecules such as proteins and nucleic acids giving a Raman signature [14]. However, Raman spectra from saliva are inherently weak, making interpretation difficult [15]. For this reason enhancement of the Raman signal using a surface-enhanced approach with gold particles is being studied [15].

Discussion and Conclusion

As mentioned previously, Raman spectroscopy has a potential advantage over other optical methods due to its ability to provide a biochemical 'fingerprint'. However, Raman has inherently been associated with a weak signal and problems with autofluorescence. Autofluorescence is wavelength dependent and the increased use of incident photons in the near infrared region of the electromagnetic spectrum has diminished its effects. The use of lasers with a greater photon flux intensity can to some degree overcome a weak signal, also allowing spectra to be collected within a relatively short time frame in addition to overcoming the effects of fluorescence. The highly detailed molecular profile produced by Raman spectroscopy can also lead to difficulty with interpretation. Such accuracy proves difficult to determine causes of spectral differences, thus more complex data classification models are being used in an attempt to 'un-lock' it's potential. Linear discriminant analysis and principal component analysis are multivariate statistical analysis methods which are utilized along with partial least square and non-linear mapping in Raman data analysis [16–20]. However, others are utilizing more complex chemo metric classification models based around computational intelligence [21–23]. Until validated methods providing repeated accuracy on test samples are discovered, this technique will remain in the research arena.

Optical coherence tomography has recently been used in-vivo to determine the nature of lesions within the bladder [24]. These authors found 100% sensitivity with this optical technique for malignant lesions, also demonstrating 100% sensitivity for detecting invasion through the lamina propria. Other authors have been increasing the accuracy of OCT in cervical neoplasia demonstrating efficacy within the clinical setting [25]. In their review article, DeCoro and Wilder-Smith consider the possibilities for OCT in oral carcinoma [26]. Infrared and fluorescence spectroscopy have also been used for ex-vivo and in-vivo analysis [27–29].

At present the gold standard of cancer diagnosis is histological assessment. However, this is labour intensive; the specimen needs prior preparation; and is open to human error. Once a diagnosis of cancer has been made the patient is discussed at the multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meeting where clinical staff such as surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, and radiologists, and non-clinical staff; allied health professionals such as speech therapy and clinical nurse specialists will discuss appropriate treatment options for the patient. Patients are then seen in clinic and a definitive treatment plan agreed. As has been discussed so far early diagnosis directly affects morbidity and mortality in H&N cancer. The ability to diagnose malignant disease at the earliest opportunity allows treatment options to be planned as early as possible. If the general practitioner could provide a diagnosis of cancer to the specialist the first meeting could discuss treatment rather than further examination, booking for diagnostic biopsy and radiological investigations, and then MDT discussion, followed by treatment.

There has been a paucity of literature regarding Raman spectroscopy in head and neck cancer detection. However, others have undertaken in-vivo analysis of malignancies in other body regions [30–33]. Raman has success in other key health areas such as cardiovascular diseases, and dental care [34–37]. Following the introduction of health care targets for cancer, and with an ever-aging population the need for rapid cancer detection has never been greater. There is no doubt Raman spectroscopy could confer great patient benefit with early, rapid and accurate diagnosis. The authors do not believe optical diagnostics should replace pathology but aid cancer diagnosis. This technique is labour free without the need for prior sample preparation. It could reduce the need for whole pathological specimen examination, in theatre it could help to determine margin status, and finally peripheral blood diagnosis may be an achievable target.

References

  1. 1.

    Swinson B, Jerjes W, El-Maaytah M, Norris P, Hopper C: Optical techniques in diagnosis of head and neck cancer. Oral Oncology. 2006, 42: 221-228. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.05.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Upile T, Jerjes W, Sterenborg HJCM, El-Naggar AK, Sandison A, Witjes MJH, Biel MA, et al: Head & Neck optical diagnostics: vision of the future. Head and Neck Oncology. 2009, 1: 25-10.1186/1758-3284-1-25.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hanlon EB, Manoharan R, Koo TW, Shafer KE, Motz JT, Fitzmaurice M, Kramer JR, Itzkan I, Dasari RR, Feld MS: Prospects for in vivo Raman spectroscopy. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2000, 45: R1-R59. 10.1088/0031-9155/45/2/201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Swain RJ, Steven MM: Raman micro spectroscopy for non-invasive biochemical analysis of single cells. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2007, 35 (3): 544-549. 10.1042/BST0350544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Harris AT, Garg M, Yang XB, Fisher SE, Kirkham J, Smith DA, Martin-Hirsch DP, High AS: Raman spectroscopy and advanced mathematical modelling in the discrimination of human thyroid cell lines. Head and Neck Oncology. 2009, 1: 38-10.1186/1758-3284-1-38.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lones MA, Smith SL, Harris AT, High AS, Fisher SE, Smith DA, Kirkham J: Discriminating Normal and Cancerous Thyroid Cell Lines using Implicit Context Representation Cartesian Genetic Programming. Proc. 2010 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC). Edited by: Fogel G, et al. 2010, IEEE Press

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Stone N, Stavroulaki P, Kendall C, Birchall M, Barr H: Raman spectroscopy for early detection of laryngeal malignancy: Preliminary results. The Laryngoscope. 2000, 110: 1756-2872. 10.1097/00005537-200010000-00037.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lau DP, Huang Z, Lui H, Anderson DW, Berean K, Morrison MD, Shen L, Zeng H: Raman spectroscopy for optical diagnosis in the larnx: preliminary findings. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2005, 37: 192-200. 10.1002/lsm.20226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lau DP, Huang Z, Lui H, Man CS, Berean K, Morrison MD, Zeng H: Raman spectroscopy for optical diagnosis in normal and cancerous tissue of the nasopharynx - preliminary findings. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2003, 32: 210-214. 10.1002/lsm.10084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gniadecka M, Philipsen PA, Sigurdsson S, Wessel S, Nielsen OF, Christensen DH, Hercogova J: Melanoma diagnosis by Raman spectroscopy and neural networks: structure alterations in proteins and lipids in intact cancer tissue. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2004, 122: 443-449. 10.1046/j.0022-202X.2004.22208.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Harris AT, Lungari A, Needham CJ, Smith SL, Lones MA, Fisher SE, Yang XB, Cooper N, Kirkham J, Smith DA, Martin-Hirsch DP, High AS: Potential for Raman spectroscopy to provide cancer screening using a peripheral blood sample. Head and Neck Oncology. 2009, 1: 34-10.1186/1758-3284-1-34.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Malini R, Venkatakrishna K, Kurien J, Pai KM, Rao L, Kartha VB, Krishna CM: Discrimination of normal, inflammatory, premalignant, and malignant oral tissue: A Raman spectroscopy study. Biopolymers. 2006, 81 (3): 179-193. 10.1002/bip.20398.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Reddy SP, Ramaswamy P, Sunanda C, Milanjeet : Role of gold nanoparticles in early detection of oral cancer. Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology. 2010, 22 (1): 30-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nagler RM: Saliva as a tool for oral cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Oral Oncology. 2009, 45: 1006-1010. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.07.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kah JCY, Kho KW, Lee CGL, Sheppard CJR, Shen ZX, Soo KC, Olivio MC: Early diagnosis of oral cancer based on the surface Plasmon resonance of gold nanoparticles. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2007, 2 (4): 785-798.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Notingher I, Jell G, Lohbauer U, Salih V, Hench LL: In situ non-invasive spectral discrimination between bone cell phenotypes used in tissue engineering. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 2004, 92: 1180-1192. 10.1002/jcb.20136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Notinger I, Jell G, Notingher PL, Bisson I, Tsigkou O, Polak JM, Stevens MM, Hench LL: Multivariate analysis of Raman spectra for in vitro non-invasive studies of living cells. Journal of Molecular Structure. 2005, 744-747: 179-185. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2004.12.046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Harz M, Kiehntopf M, Stockel S, Rosch P, Deufel T, Popp J: Analysis of single blood cells for CSF diagnostics via a combination of fluorescence staining and micro-Raman spectroscopy. Analyst. 2008, 133: 1416-1423. 10.1039/b716132h.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Krafft C, Knetschke T, Siegner A, Funk RHW, Salzer R: Mapping of single cells by near infrared Raman microspectroscopy. Vibrational Spectroscopy. 2003, 32: 75-83. 10.1016/S0924-2031(03)00049-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jarvis R, Broadhurst D, Johnson H, O'Boyle N, Goodacre R: PYCHEM: a multivariate analysis package for python. Bioinformatics. 2006, 22: 2565-2566. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl416.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Jarvis RM, Goodacre R: Genetic algorithm optimization for pre-processing and variable selection of spectroscopic data. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (7): 860-868. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Vaidyanathan S, Broadhurst DI, Kell DB, Goodacre R: Explanatory optimization of protein mass spectrometry via genetic search. Analytical Chemistry. 2003, 75: 6679-6686. 10.1021/ac034669a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Goodacre R, Neal MJ, Kell DB: Rapid and quantitative analysis of the pyrolysis mass spectra of complex binary and tertiary mixtures using multivariate calibration and artificial neural networks. Analytical Chemistry. 1994, 66: 1070-1085. 10.1021/ac00079a024.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Karl A, Stepp H, Willmann E, Buchner A, Hocaoglu Y, Stief C, Tritschler S: Optical oherence tomography for bladder cancer - ready as a surrogate for optical biopsy? - results of a prospective mono-centre study. European Journal of Medical Research. 2010, 15 (3): 131-134.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Liu ZH, Belinson SE, Li J, Yang B, Na WL, Tresser NJ, Wang C, Mohr M, et al: Diagnostic Efficacy of Real-Time Optical Coherence Tomography in the Management of Preinvasive and Invasive Neoplasia of the Uterine Cervix. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2010, 20 (2): 283-287. Krafft S,

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    DeCoro M, Wilder-Smith P: Potential of optical coherence tomography for early diagnosis of oral malignancies. Expert review of anticancer therapy. 2010, 10 (3): 321-329. 10.1586/era.09.191.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Madhuri S, Vengadesan N, Aruna P, Koteeswaran D, Ventatesan P, Ganesan S: Native fluorescence spectroscopy of blood plasma in the characterization of oral malignancy. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 2003, 78 (2): 197-204. 10.1562/0031-8655(2003)078<0197:NFSOBP>2.0.CO;2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lasch A, Haensch W, Lwis N, Kidder LH, Naumann D: Characterization of colorectal adenocarcinoma sections by spatially resolved FT-IR microscpectroscopy. Applied Spectroscopy. 2002, 56: 1-9. 10.1366/0003702021954322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wood BR, Chiriboga L, Yee H, Quinn MA, McNaughton D, Diem M: FTIR mapping of the cervical transformation zone, squamous and glandular epithelium. Gynecologic Oncology. 2004, 93 (4): 59-68. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.12.028.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Haka A, Volynskaya Z, Gardecki J, Nazemi J, Lyons J, Hicks D, Fitzmaurice M, Dasari R, Crowe J, Feld M: In vivo margin assessment during partial mastectomy breast surgery using Raman spectroscopy. Cancer Research. 2006, 66: 3317-3322. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2815.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Moncrieff M, Cotton S, Claridges E, Hall P: Spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis: a new technique for imaging pigmented skin lesions. British Journal of Dermatology. 2002, 146: 448-457. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04569.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Molckovsky A, Song LM, Shim MG, Marcon NE, Wilson BC: Diagnostic potential of near-infrared Raman spectroscopy in the colon: differentiating adenomatous from hyperplastic polyps. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2003, 57: 396-402. 10.1067/mge.2003.105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Chowdary M, Kumar K, Mathew S, Roa L, Krishna M, Kurien J: Biochemical correlation of Raman spectra of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues: A spectral deconvolution study. Biopolymers. 2009, 91: 539-546. 10.1002/bip.21171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Motz JT, Fitzmaurice M, Miller A: In vivo Raman spectral pathology of human atherosclerosis and vulnerable plaque. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2006, 11 (2): 0210031-9. 10.1117/1.2190967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Buschman HP, Marple ET, Wach ML, Bennett B, Bakker Schut TC, Bruining HA, Bruschke AV, et al: In Vivo determination of the molecular composition of artery wall by intravascular Raman spectroscopy. Analytical Chemistry. 2000, 72: 3771-3775. 10.1021/ac000298b.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Utzinger U, Richards-Kortum R: Fibre optic probes for biomedical spectroscopy. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2003, 8: 121-147. 10.1117/1.1528207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Choo-Smith LP, Hewko M, Sowa MG: Emerging Raman Applications and Techniques in Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Fields. Emerging Dental Applications of Raman Spectroscopy. 2010, 263-284.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The main author would like to thanks Cancer Research UK for funding the work on Raman spectroscopy in Head and Neck Cancer.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Ear, Nose and Throat/Head and Neck Surgery, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Trust, Huddersfield, UK

    Andrew T Harris, Andrew Rennie, Haroon Waqar-Uddin, Sarah R Wheatley, Samit K Ghosh & Dominic P Martin-Hirsch

  2. Section of Experimental Therapeutics, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

    Sheila E Fisher

  3. School of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK

    Sheila E Fisher

  4. Department of Pathology Leeds Dental Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

    Alec S High

  5. Department of Oral Biology, Leeds dental Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

    Jennifer Kirkham

  6. Department of Otolaryngology with Head & Neck Surgery, Chase farm Hospital, Enfield, U.K.

    Tahwinder Upile

  7. Head & Neck Unit UCLH, Euston Road, London, UK

    Tahwinder Upile

Authors
  1. Andrew T Harris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew Rennie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haroon Waqar-Uddin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sarah R Wheatley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Samit K Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dominic P Martin-Hirsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sheila E Fisher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Alec S High
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jennifer Kirkham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Tahwinder Upile
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew T Harris.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

AH, AR, SW, HW-U initially drafted the manuscript. SG, DM-H, SF, AH and TU provided expert surgical and pathological advice. JK provided the biochemical expertise. All authors made an editorial contribution to the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, A.T., Rennie, A., Waqar-Uddin, H. et al. Raman spectroscopy in head and neck cancer. Head Neck Oncol 2, 26 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-2-26

Download citation

Keywords

  • Optical Coherence Tomography
  • Papillary Carcinoma
  • Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Raman Spectroscopy
  • Anaplastic Carcinoma

Head & Neck Oncology

ISSN: 1758-3284