- Poster presentation
- Open Access
- Published:
cTNM vs. pTNM: are we as good as we think?
Head & Neck Oncology volume 1, Article number: P19 (2009)
Background
Accurate clinical staging of oral squamous cell cancer can be quite difficult to achieve especially if nodal involvement is identified. Radiologically-assisted clinical staging is more accurate and informs the clinician of locoregional and distant metastasis. Locoregional metastasis is radiologically assessed by MRI of the head and neck region and 2D-US of the neck followed by FNAC of any identified neck lump when indicated. Distant metastasis is usually assessed by either a PA-CXR or a CT chest.
Materials and methods
In this study an analysis was performed that involved 245 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Clinical TNM (cTNM) staging involved clinical examination of the tumour and neck nodes, MRI of the head and neck, US neck (± FNAC) and PA-CXR or CT chest). Pathological TNM (pTNM) is provided by the pathologist following the surgical resection of the tumour with or without the lymphatic chain. Both cTNM and pTNM were then compared.
Results
There are occasional significant discrepancies between clinical and pathological staging TNM however in general there is a good correlation between staging (Spearman rank correlation coefficient, 0.9787).
Conclusion
It is debatable that inaccurate registration of nodal involvement during the clinical examination is unlikely to affect the patient's prognosis. Histopathological grading would rectify the error and the patient would undergo an adjuvant therapy (i.e. radiation) that would be delivered anyway in the postoperative phase.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Hamdoon, Z., Jerjes, W., Upile, T. et al. cTNM vs. pTNM: are we as good as we think?. Head Neck Oncol 1 (Suppl 1), P19 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-1-S1-P19
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-1-S1-P19
Keywords
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Distant Metastasis
- Clinical Staging
- Nodal Involvement
- Spearman Rank Correlation